Bueno hoy les vengo con algo interesante irónicamente en humanidades me toco leer un texto hasta interesante y la verdad la temática que maneja entre el egoísmo humano y una nueva metodología de pensamiento que se enfoque en estudiar los problemas no como sus piezas por separado sino como un conjunto de algo me gusto ya que es básicamente mi pensamiento así que aquí les dejare esta vez el texto para que lo lean y de paso les dejo mi ensayo basado completamente en ese articulo disfrútenlo es una temática muy interesante para aquello pensadores del nuevo mundo el texto se llama "
Virtual environments as intuition synthesisers" les dejo mi ensayo para que lo disfruten lamentablemente lo tengo en ingles espero no les moleste
MANUEL DE LANDA
Virtual environments as intuition synthesisers
This is just a little way of describing what the author of “Virtual environments as intuition synthesisers” is trying to say and what he wants to tell us.
The author of this has an interesting starting idea about the sum of individuals, he tell to everybody that the whole may be more than a sum of individuals saying that the combination of the functions of many individuals are better than the simple idea of a group of them working together without a connection between them he call them “emergent properties” in the way he tell us what they are he explain that are the direct consequence of that idea of “the whole may be more than the sum of its parts” as he says at the beginning of the first part of the text. Well after that he mention an interesting contraposition about the actual way of generating ideas, he says the actual ways is far too wrong because it takes the problems and the situations as a sum of various little parts, telling us this method is called analysis, but it’s wrong because this way of thinking can´t take the problems with “emergent properties” ´cause they can be divided in many parts, they are a whole so he talks about a complement to that way of thinking, he talks about the synthesis, that takes the problems and ideas as a whole not as parts of something, he makes the example of the complex global behavior telling that it can´t be studied as parts cause it it’s a complex combination of human and social connections that change in various ways so it has to be studied as a whole mass of events and relations.
In his study of how to take problems his solutions are really incredible, as he say it’s better to see problems as a whole mass of things, but he goes beyond that telling us a ways of study them he call them virtual environments and artificial life, compared to artificial intelligence that takes a step forward with the use computers not as tool but more like help for us, he calls artificial life as a way of see the problem as a whole called, virtual environment , whose real objective is see a pyramid (problem) from the base not from the top like everybody does, that’s a big help for us to see the mechanism and real things behind this emergent properties, but after all of this the virtual environments show a problem, beside the fact that most of this environments show us a problem from the outside as a whole union of its parts there was a little problem, it was the population, the environment showed the action of a whole group of persons, a population not as individuals, so the fact here was that in this virtual environments the population thinking, not that Darwinism way of thinking that says the “survival of the fittest” it’s not the right one, the important thing here is the essence of the population not its individual conscience, maybe a good task to do just as the author says is to develop is extending the insight of the population, just like making a new evolution in linguistic or something like that, beside that the virtual environment presents another problem, usually the old fashioned ways of thinking don’t change ´cause the people that are accustomed to use it don’t want to change that so new ways of thinking, even if that way is better it will be unused ´cause they prefer their own and more comfortable way of developing problems so it’s a vicious circle of old fashioned thinking that doesn´t want to progress, he names a case called “the game theory” whose propose was useful since the 80´s with the military think-tanks, this theory basically call the natural human thinking of selfishness in dilemma situations where if both are to selfish both pay and the paranoiac thinking of the other betraying the others makes it more difficult to overlay, so he close this part asking if the humanity can cooperate in a world of mere and pure egoism? And, beyond that the surprising answer that tell us that it can happen.
Finally the author close its text with a way of telling us that this virtual environments not only help in the scientific manners but also in the art, not as important as the scientific cause its most like it only appears in the modernism but it’s also a good ways to see that this is a huge evolution in the human mind and ways of thinking cause it combines as much as many thing in our “retarded mind” it’s also a good example the AI (artificial intelligence) whose bases are those, the idea of the base-top way of resolving problems, and finally this in his point of view can become a good tool as we evolve as thinking beings.
And finally this, not as his conclusion but as a close to this theme, is that maybe we are a little to “retarded” to see the huge proportions of this way of resolving problems, or study thing, or just see the world but maybe in a future our close mind can evolve to a point where this can become a starting point for every social being in this world, and if we can get to that point maybe our evolution can make a new step, so it’s not only a good tool maybe it´s more than that, but until the close-minded people change their mind and let this virtual environments develop a new way of thinking this is going to be just another good thinking in a retarded world, so let’s try to take this to the next step and don’t close our minds to this new possibilities.
Bueno y asi los dejo espero les guste esto por que la verdad me esforcé y es un tema que de verdad me agrada es bonito ver que hay gente de mayor "rango" intelectual que yo que piensa muy parecido a mi tal vez eso significa que voy por buen camino no se que piensen ustedes, ni si quiera si pensaran igual que yo en este tema pero espero ver debates con esto pues es un buen tema de discusión y cerrando esto los dejo.
"It is hard to live in a world without knowledge, I only want people to start thinking, Just open your mind and think about everything around you, This is our world, lets make it better.
Please aport new ideas, please talk about averthing you want, open your mind its all i want, maybe in the future this could make a new and better world.
This is my blog but i want it to be a fountain of new ideas.
Im Tyki a devil angel with new ideas nice to meet you"
Follow me facebook twitter tumblr
email formspring My page
